195 lines
3.8 KiB
Markdown
195 lines
3.8 KiB
Markdown
|
|
# CONTROL PROMPT – GLOBAL DOMAIN, SEO & LOCALIZATION VERIFICATION
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Author: Erik Svensson
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Before proceeding with any task related to quiXzoom or Landvex, perform a complete self-audit against the Global Domain, SEO & Localization Strategy.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Do not make assumptions. Verify actual understanding.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Answer the following questions in detail.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## SECTION 1 – STRATEGIC UNDERSTANDING
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
What is the primary objective of the domain strategy?
|
|||
|
|
Why are country-specific domains being used instead of relying solely on .com domains?
|
|||
|
|
Explain the relationship between:
|
|||
|
|
- quixzoom.com
|
|||
|
|
- quixzoom.se
|
|||
|
|
- quixzoom.fr
|
|||
|
|
- quixzoom.de
|
|||
|
|
- quixzoom.us
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Explain the relationship between:
|
|||
|
|
- landvex.com
|
|||
|
|
- landvex.se
|
|||
|
|
- landvex.fr
|
|||
|
|
- landvex.de
|
|||
|
|
- landvex.us
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Are these separate websites or localized entry points into a unified platform?
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Provide a detailed explanation.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## SECTION 2 – ARCHITECTURE VALIDATION
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
List and explain:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
- Codebase strategy
|
|||
|
|
- Backend strategy
|
|||
|
|
- Database strategy
|
|||
|
|
- Authentication strategy
|
|||
|
|
- Deployment strategy
|
|||
|
|
- CMS strategy
|
|||
|
|
- Translation strategy
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
For each item explain:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
a) What exists.
|
|||
|
|
b) Why it exists.
|
|||
|
|
c) What must never be duplicated.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## SECTION 3 – SCALABILITY TEST
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
A new market is launched tomorrow:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
- Country: Poland
|
|||
|
|
- Language: Polish
|
|||
|
|
- Currency: PLN
|
|||
|
|
- Domain: quixzoom.pl
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Describe step-by-step exactly what should happen.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Include:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
- Domain configuration
|
|||
|
|
- Locale configuration
|
|||
|
|
- SEO configuration
|
|||
|
|
- Translation configuration
|
|||
|
|
- Analytics configuration
|
|||
|
|
- Legal configuration
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
State clearly whether any new code should be required.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## SECTION 4 – SEO UNDERSTANDING
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Explain:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
- What hreflang is.
|
|||
|
|
- Why hreflang is required.
|
|||
|
|
- What canonical tags are.
|
|||
|
|
- Why canonical tags are required.
|
|||
|
|
- How country domains should interlink.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Provide examples.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## SECTION 5 – CONTENT STRATEGY
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
For France, list:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
- Homepage content
|
|||
|
|
- Landing page content
|
|||
|
|
- City pages
|
|||
|
|
- FAQ strategy
|
|||
|
|
- Support content
|
|||
|
|
- Local keyword strategy
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
For Germany, repeat the exercise.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
For the United States, repeat the exercise.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## SECTION 6 – LOCALIZATION TEST
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
A user enters quixzoom.fr
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Explain:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
- What language they should see.
|
|||
|
|
- What currency they should see.
|
|||
|
|
- What SEO structure should be active.
|
|||
|
|
- What legal information should be displayed.
|
|||
|
|
- What analytics profile should be used.
|
|||
|
|
- How the platform remains synchronized with every other country version.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## SECTION 7 – BRAND GOVERNANCE
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Explain:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
- What is allowed to change between countries?
|
|||
|
|
- What is not allowed to change?
|
|||
|
|
- What parts of the brand must remain globally synchronized?
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
List every category.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## SECTION 8 – FAILURE DETECTION
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Identify all architectural mistakes that would violate the master strategy.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Examples:
|
|||
|
|
- Separate codebases
|
|||
|
|
- Country-specific product forks
|
|||
|
|
- Duplicate CMS installations
|
|||
|
|
- Independent branding
|
|||
|
|
- Independent authentication systems
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
List every violation you can identify.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## SECTION 9 – IMPLEMENTATION STATUS
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Provide a score from 0–100% for each area:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
- Domain architecture
|
|||
|
|
- Localization architecture
|
|||
|
|
- SEO architecture
|
|||
|
|
- Content architecture
|
|||
|
|
- Analytics architecture
|
|||
|
|
- Brand governance
|
|||
|
|
- Automation readiness
|
|||
|
|
- Scalability readiness
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
For every score below 100%, explain:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
- Missing components
|
|||
|
|
- Risks
|
|||
|
|
- Required actions
|
|||
|
|
- Estimated implementation effort
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## SECTION 10 – FINAL CERTIFICATION
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Answer with either:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**CERTIFIED**
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
or
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**NOT CERTIFIED**
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
If NOT CERTIFIED:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Provide a complete gap analysis and implementation roadmap until certification can be achieved.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
If CERTIFIED:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Provide evidence supporting the certification and explain why the platform is ready for global expansion across Europe and the United States.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Do not provide generic answers. Demonstrate complete system understanding, identify inconsistencies, and challenge any assumptions that cannot be verified.
|