From b934797e651d69e07c7379b66504c23dcb789fa9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bernt Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2026 12:21:20 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?docs:=20Field=20Trial=20Log=20v1.1=20=E2=80=94?= =?UTF-8?q?=20Pilot=20phases=20+=20filming=20protocol?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit - Added four pilot phases (product research, not marketing): 1. Collection — what can actually be detected? 2. Analysis — are decisions understandable? 3. Verification — was recommendation correct? 4. Reflection — what needs to change? - Measurement principle: - Not: Did AI find a crack? - But: Did this become a decision a real person could act on? - Document 'non-decisions' — equally valuable as clear decisions - Film workflow, not just infrastructure: - How you find area, choose mission, document - What feels unclear, when you become uncertain - When system saves time - Observer mindset: document first, change model later - Build model from real workflows, not assumptions Rationale: First 20-50 real missions teach more than months of modeling. --- docs/design/FIELD_TRIAL_LOG.md | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/design/FIELD_TRIAL_LOG.md b/docs/design/FIELD_TRIAL_LOG.md index c259b6243..5bbebd977 100644 --- a/docs/design/FIELD_TRIAL_LOG.md +++ b/docs/design/FIELD_TRIAL_LOG.md @@ -100,6 +100,67 @@ Example: 65 of 72 executed = **90%** --- +## Pilot Structure + +**Four phases — product research, not marketing:** + +| Phase | What You Do | What You Learn | +|-------|-------------|----------------| +| **1. Collection** | Film, photograph, create observations | What can actually be detected? | +| **2. Analysis** | Let pipeline create Findings and Decisions | Are decisions understandable and relevant? | +| **3. Verification** | Compare with reality on site | Was the recommendation correct? | +| **4. Reflection** | Document what worked and what didn't | What needs to change in the model? | + +**Full chain captured:** +``` +Reality → Observation → Evidence → Finding → Decision → Action → Outcome → Learning +``` + +## What to Measure + +**Not:** Did AI find a crack? +**But:** Did this become a decision a real person could act on? + +**Example:** +- AI finds 23 cracks +- LandveX says: "Inspect Road A12 within 30 days" +- **The second is the product.** + +## Document "Non-Decisions" + +Also valuable: +- "No action needed" +- "More data required" +- "Cannot recommend anything yet" + +If the system always tries to give advice even when evidence is weak, you risk building a system that feels confident when it shouldn't. + +## Film the Workflow + +Since you are conducting the pilots, film more than just infrastructure. Also film: +- How you find an area +- Why you choose a mission +- How you document +- How long it takes +- What feels unclear +- When you become uncertain +- When the system saves time + +This material becomes invaluable for product development, onboarding, training, and sales. + +## Observer Mindset + +**Principle:** If data contradicts the model, the model should change. + +Use the same approach during pilots. If you notice: +- A step feels unnecessary +- A decision becomes unclear +- A recommendation cannot be acted on + +**Document first, change model later.** Build the model from real workflows instead of assumptions. + +**The first 20–50 real missions will give you more valuable product knowledge than months of additional modeling.** + ## Status **ACTIVE — Awaiting first customer case** @@ -111,3 +172,4 @@ Example: 65 of 72 executed = **90%** | Version | Datum | Beskrivning | |---------|-------|-------------| | 1.0 | 2026-07-02 | Initial field trial log template | +| 1.1 | 2026-07-02 | Added pilot phases, measurement principles, filming protocol |